Feasibility study to duplicate Renewable Energy output at the Shek Pik Reservoir using Wind Energy
1- Remarks of existing System
FPV system at Shek Pik Reservoir
The pilot system has been successfully installed at Shek Pik Reservoir in February 2017 for supplying electricity to the nearby pumping station of the reservoir. The current output and cumulative output are as below:
Total Electricity Generated: 446,732 kWh (5 years)
CO2 Reduction: 312,712 kg
Electricity Generated: 89,346kWh per year
Project Cost: 3.5 Million HKD
Recovery of investment: 34 years
CO2 Reduction in 34 years : 2,128 tons of CO2
2- WIND ENERGY PROPOSAL
Our proposal is to duplicate the current output of this system 90,000 kWh per year, by using an array of 34 Vertical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWT) deployed along the bridge (see pictures).
Average output power per VAWT: 315 watts
Electricity generated per year: 2,759 kWh per year
Amount of VAWTs: 34
Total Electricity generated per year: 93,806 kWh per year
Estimated Project Cost: reduced by around 40%
Recovery of investment: 19 years
CO2 Reduction in 34 years: 2,234 tons of CO2
Alternative:
Deploy 1 big VAWT over the house plus 24 VAWT along the bridge, 12 on each side (see pictures)
Energy Type | Electricity Generated per year (kWh) | Cost (HKD mil) | Recovery of Investment base on FiT program (Year) | CO2 Reduction per year (tons) |
Solar | 89,346 | 3.5 | 34 | 63 |
Wind | 93,806 | around 40% less | 19 | 66 |
Wind Turbine Solution:
Alternative:
According to paper from “The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers Hong Kong Branch” where they describe Floating PV systems, the main problems might be related to wind speed.
Disadvantages versus Advantages | Floating PV | Wind Turbines |
| ❌ | ✅ |
| ❌ | ✅ |
| ❌ | ✅ |
| ❌ | ✅ |
| ❌ | ✅ |
| ❌ | ✅ |
| ✅ | ✅ |
| ✅ | ✅ |
Note: In the system, we are proposing with Wind Turbines, we turn ALL these disadvantages into advantages because the wind speed is the main factor in wind energy production